{"id":"arxiv:0809.4062","kind":"article","title":"The muon g-2 discrepancy: errors or new physics?","authors":["M. Passera","W. J. Marciano","A. Sirlin"],"author_count":3,"year":2008,"published":"2008-09-24","venue":"AIP Conf.Proc.1078:378-381,2009","cited_by":25,"doi":"10.1063/1.3051967","arxiv_id":"0809.4062","nct_id":null,"source_url":"https://arxiv.org/abs/0809.4062","archive_url":"https://space-kitty.com/papers/arxiv:0809.4062","updated":"2008-09-24","pmid":null,"pmcid":null,"openalex_id":"W1535508575","pdf_url":"https://arxiv.org/pdf/0809.4062","abstract":"After a brief review of the muon g-2 status, we discuss hypothetical errors in the Standard Model prediction that could explain the present discrepancy with the experimental value. None of them looks likely. In particular, an hypothetical increase of the hadroproduction cross section in low-energy e^+e^- collisions could bridge the muon g-2 discrepancy, but is shown to be unlikely in view of current experimental error estimates. If, nonetheless, this turns out to be the explanation of the discrepancy, then the 95% CL upper bound on the Higgs boson mass is reduced to about 130 GeV which, in conjunction with the experimental 114.4 GeV 95% CL lower bound, leaves a narrow window for the mass of this fundamental particle.","abstract_license":"CC0-1.0 (arXiv descriptive metadata)","license":null,"is_open_access":false,"retracted":false,"peer_reviewed":null,"categories":["hep-ph"],"details":null,"provenance":"arxiv","attribution":"Abstract: arXiv descriptive metadata (CC0). Thank you to arXiv for use of its open access interoperability. This service was not reviewed or approved by, nor does it necessarily express or reflect the policies or opinions of, arXiv.","topics":[{"slug":"particle-physics-bsm","name":"Particle Physics & Beyond the Standard Model","domain_slug":"physics"}],"cited_in_dossiers":[]}