{"id":"arxiv:1001.4528","kind":"article","title":"The muon g-2 discrepancy: new physics or a relatively light Higgs?","authors":["M. Passera","W. J. Marciano","A. Sirlin"],"author_count":3,"year":2010,"published":"2010-01-26","venue":"Chinese Physics C","cited_by":14,"doi":"10.1088/1674-1137/34/6/020","arxiv_id":"1001.4528","nct_id":null,"source_url":"https://arxiv.org/abs/1001.4528","archive_url":"https://space-kitty.com/papers/arxiv:1001.4528","updated":"2010-01-26","pmid":null,"pmcid":null,"openalex_id":"W2073032650","pdf_url":"https://arxiv.org/pdf/1001.4528","abstract":"After a brief review of the muon g-2 status, we discuss hypothetical errors in the Standard Model prediction that might explain the present discrepancy with the experimental value. None of them seems likely. In particular, a hypothetical increase of the hadroproduction cross section in low-energy e+e- collisions could bridge the muon g-2 discrepancy, but it is shown to be unlikely in view of current experimental error estimates. If, nonetheless, this turns out to be the explanation of the discrepancy, then the 95% CL upper bound on the Higgs boson mass is reduced to about 135GeV which, in conjunction with the experimental 114.4GeV 95% CL lower bound, leaves a narrow window for the mass of this fundamental particle.","abstract_license":"CC0-1.0 (arXiv descriptive metadata)","license":null,"is_open_access":false,"retracted":false,"peer_reviewed":null,"categories":["hep-ph"],"details":null,"provenance":"arxiv","attribution":"Abstract: arXiv descriptive metadata (CC0). Thank you to arXiv for use of its open access interoperability. This service was not reviewed or approved by, nor does it necessarily express or reflect the policies or opinions of, arXiv.","topics":[{"slug":"particle-physics-bsm","name":"Particle Physics & Beyond the Standard Model","domain_slug":"physics"}],"cited_in_dossiers":[]}