{"id":"arxiv:1501.06793","kind":"preprint","title":"Geometric tamely ramified local theta correspondence in the framework of the geometric Langlands program","authors":["Banafsheh Farang-Hariri"],"author_count":1,"year":2015,"published":"2015-01-27","venue":null,"cited_by":null,"doi":null,"arxiv_id":"1501.06793","nct_id":null,"source_url":"https://arxiv.org/abs/1501.06793","archive_url":"https://space-kitty.com/papers/arxiv:1501.06793","updated":"2015-01-27","pmid":null,"pmcid":null,"openalex_id":null,"pdf_url":"https://arxiv.org/pdf/1501.06793","abstract":"This paper deals with the geometric local theta correspondence at the Iwahori level for dual reductive pairs of type II over a non Archimedean field $F$ of characteristic $p\\neq 2$ in the framework of the geometric Langlands program. First we construct and study the geometric version of the invariants of the Weil representation of the Iwahori-Hecke algebras. In the particular case of $(GL_1, GL_m)$ we give a complete geometric description of the corresponding category. The second part of the paper deals with geometric local Langlands functoriality at the Iwahori level in a general setting. Given two reductive connected groups $G$, $H$ over $F$ and a morphism $\\check{G}\\times \\mathrm{SL}_2\\to\\check{H}$ of Langlands dual groups, we construct a bimodule over the affine extended Hecke algebras of $H$ and $G$ that should realize the geometric local Arthur-Langlands functoriality at the Iwahori level. Then, we propose a conjecture describing the geometric local theta correspondence at the Iwahori level constructed in the first part in terms of this bimodule and we prove our conjecture for pairs $(GL_1, GL_m)$.","abstract_license":"CC0-1.0 (arXiv descriptive metadata)","license":null,"is_open_access":false,"retracted":false,"peer_reviewed":false,"categories":["math.RT","math.AG"],"details":null,"provenance":"arxiv","attribution":"Abstract: arXiv descriptive metadata (CC0). Thank you to arXiv for use of its open access interoperability. This service was not reviewed or approved by, nor does it necessarily express or reflect the policies or opinions of, arXiv.","topics":[],"cited_in_dossiers":[]}