{"id":"arxiv:2009.01113","kind":"article","title":"Wigner's friend, Feynman's paths and material records","authors":["A. Matzkin","D. Sokolovski"],"author_count":2,"year":2020,"published":"2020-09-02","venue":"EPL 131 40001 (2020 )","cited_by":11,"doi":"10.1209/0295-5075/131/40001","arxiv_id":"2009.01113","nct_id":null,"source_url":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2009.01113","archive_url":"https://space-kitty.com/papers/arxiv:2009.01113","updated":"2020-09-02","pmid":null,"pmcid":null,"openalex_id":"W3082409278","pdf_url":"https://arxiv.org/pdf/2009.01113","abstract":"The place and role of an Observer in quantum mechanics has been a subject of an ongoing debate since the theory's inception. Wigner brought this question to the fore in a celebrated scenario in which a super-Observer observes a Friend making a measurement. Here we briefly review why this \\e{Wigner Friend scenario} has been taken to require the introduction of the Observer's consciousness, or alternatively to show the inconsistency of quantum measurement theory. We will argue that quantum theory can consistently leave observers outside its narrative, by making only minimal assumptions about how the information about the observed results is stored in material records.","abstract_license":"CC0-1.0 (arXiv descriptive metadata)","license":null,"is_open_access":false,"retracted":false,"peer_reviewed":null,"categories":["quant-ph"],"details":null,"provenance":"arxiv","attribution":"Abstract: arXiv descriptive metadata (CC0). Thank you to arXiv for use of its open access interoperability. This service was not reviewed or approved by, nor does it necessarily express or reflect the policies or opinions of, arXiv.","topics":[{"slug":"quantum-foundations","name":"Quantum Foundations","domain_slug":"physics"}],"cited_in_dossiers":[]}