{"id":"arxiv:2212.08073","kind":"preprint","title":"Constitutional AI: Harmlessness from AI Feedback","authors":["Bai, Yuntao","Saurav Kadavath","Sandipan Kundu","Amanda Askell","Jackson Kernion","Jones, Andy","Chen, Anna","Anna Darling Goldie","Azalia Mirhoseini","Cameron McKinnon","Carol Chen","Catherine Olsson","Christopher Olah","Danny Hernandez","Dawn Drain","Deep Ganguli","Dustin Li","Eli Tran-Johnson","Ethan Perez","Jamie R. Kerr","Jared Mueller","Jeffrey Ladish","Landau, Joshua","Kamal Ndousse","Kamile Lukosuite"],"author_count":51,"year":2022,"published":"2022-12-15","venue":null,"cited_by":324,"doi":null,"arxiv_id":"2212.08073","nct_id":null,"source_url":"http://arxiv.org/abs/2212.08073","archive_url":"https://space-kitty.com/papers/arxiv:2212.08073","updated":"2022-12-15","pmid":null,"pmcid":null,"openalex_id":"W4311991106","pdf_url":"https://arxiv.org/pdf/2212.08073","abstract":"As AI systems become more capable, we would like to enlist their help to supervise other AIs. We experiment with methods for training a harmless AI assistant through self-improvement, without any human labels identifying harmful outputs. The only human oversight is provided through a list of rules or principles, and so we refer to the method as 'Constitutional AI'. The process involves both a supervised learning and a reinforcement learning phase. In the supervised phase we sample from an initial model, then generate self-critiques and revisions, and then finetune the original model on revised responses. In the RL phase, we sample from the finetuned model, use a model to evaluate which of the two samples is better, and then train a preference model from this dataset of AI preferences. We then train with RL using the preference model as the reward signal, i.e. we use 'RL from AI Feedback' (RLAIF). As a result we are able to train a harmless but non-evasive AI assistant that engages with harmful queries by explaining its objections to them. Both the SL and RL methods can leverage chain-of-thought style reasoning to improve the human-judged performance and transparency of AI decision making. These methods make it possible to control AI behavior more precisely and with far fewer human labels.","abstract_license":"CC0-1.0 (arXiv descriptive metadata)","license":null,"is_open_access":true,"retracted":false,"peer_reviewed":false,"categories":["Ethics and Social Impacts of AI"],"details":null,"provenance":"openalex+arxiv","attribution":"Abstract: arXiv descriptive metadata (CC0). Thank you to arXiv for use of its open access interoperability. This service was not reviewed or approved by, nor does it necessarily express or reflect the policies or opinions of, arXiv.","topics":[{"slug":"alignment-safety","name":"AI Alignment & Safety","domain_slug":"ai"}],"cited_in_dossiers":[]}