{"id":"arxiv:2301.13379","kind":"preprint","title":"Faithful Chain-of-Thought Reasoning","authors":["Lyu, Qing","Shreya Havaldar","Adam Stein","Li Zhang","Delip Rao","Eric Wong","Marianna Apidianaki","Chris Callison-Burch"],"author_count":8,"year":2023,"published":"2023-01-31","venue":null,"cited_by":23,"doi":null,"arxiv_id":"2301.13379","nct_id":null,"source_url":"http://arxiv.org/abs/2301.13379","archive_url":"https://space-kitty.com/papers/arxiv:2301.13379","updated":"2023-09-20","pmid":null,"pmcid":null,"openalex_id":"W4318903783","pdf_url":"https://arxiv.org/pdf/2301.13379","abstract":"While Chain-of-Thought (CoT) prompting boosts Language Models' (LM) performance on a gamut of complex reasoning tasks, the generated reasoning chain does not necessarily reflect how the model arrives at the answer (aka. faithfulness). We propose Faithful CoT, a reasoning framework involving two stages: Translation (Natural Language query $\\rightarrow$ symbolic reasoning chain) and Problem Solving (reasoning chain $\\rightarrow$ answer), using an LM and a deterministic solver respectively. This guarantees that the reasoning chain provides a faithful explanation of the final answer. Aside from interpretability, Faithful CoT also improves empirical performance: it outperforms standard CoT on 9 of 10 benchmarks from 4 diverse domains, with a relative accuracy gain of 6.3% on Math Word Problems (MWP), 3.4% on Planning, 5.5% on Multi-hop Question Answering (QA), and 21.4% on Relational Inference. Furthermore, with GPT-4 and Codex, it sets the new state-of-the-art few-shot performance on 7 datasets (with 95.0+ accuracy on 6 of them), showing a strong synergy between faithfulness and accuracy.","abstract_license":"CC0-1.0 (arXiv descriptive metadata)","license":"cc-by-nc-nd","is_open_access":true,"retracted":false,"peer_reviewed":false,"categories":["Topic Modeling"],"details":null,"provenance":"openalex+arxiv","attribution":"Abstract: arXiv descriptive metadata (CC0). Thank you to arXiv for use of its open access interoperability. This service was not reviewed or approved by, nor does it necessarily express or reflect the policies or opinions of, arXiv.","topics":[{"slug":"reasoning-models","name":"Reasoning Models & Test-Time Compute","domain_slug":"ai"}],"cited_in_dossiers":[]}