{"id":"arxiv:2402.05222","kind":"article","title":"Validation Workflow for Machine Learning Interatomic Potentials for Complex Ceramics","authors":["Kimia Ghaffari","Salil Bavdekar","Douglas E. Spearot","Ghatu Subhash"],"author_count":4,"year":2024,"published":"2024-02-07","venue":"Computational Materials Science","cited_by":14,"doi":"10.1016/j.commatsci.2024.112983","arxiv_id":"2402.05222","nct_id":null,"source_url":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2402.05222","archive_url":"https://space-kitty.com/papers/arxiv:2402.05222","updated":"2024-03-26","pmid":null,"pmcid":null,"openalex_id":"W4391709366","pdf_url":"https://arxiv.org/pdf/2402.05222","abstract":"The number of published Machine Learning Interatomic Potentials (MLIPs) has increased significantly in recent years. These new data-driven potential energy approximations often lack the physics-based foundations that inform many traditionally-developed interatomic potentials and hence require robust validation methods for their applicability, accuracy, computational efficiency, and transferability to the intended applications. This work presents a sequential, three-stage workflow for MLIP validation: (i) preliminary validation, (ii) static property prediction, and (iii) dynamic property prediction. This material-agnostic procedure is demonstrated in a tutorial approach for the development of a robust MLIP for boron carbide (B4C), a widely employed, structurally complex ceramic that undergoes a deleterious deformation mechanism called \"amorphization\" under high-pressure loading. It is shown that the resulting B4C MLIP offers a more accurate prediction of properties compared to the available empirical potential.","abstract_license":"CC0-1.0 (arXiv descriptive metadata)","license":null,"is_open_access":false,"retracted":false,"peer_reviewed":null,"categories":["cond-mat.mtrl-sci","cond-mat.dis-nn","cond-mat.mes-hall"],"details":null,"provenance":"arxiv","attribution":"Abstract: arXiv descriptive metadata (CC0). Thank you to arXiv for use of its open access interoperability. This service was not reviewed or approved by, nor does it necessarily express or reflect the policies or opinions of, arXiv.","topics":[{"slug":"ai-for-science","name":"AI for Science","domain_slug":"ai"}],"cited_in_dossiers":[]}