{"id":"arxiv:2404.13038","kind":"preprint","title":"Mapping Social Choice Theory to RLHF","authors":["Jessica Dai","Eve Fleisig"],"author_count":2,"year":2024,"published":"2024-04-19","venue":null,"cited_by":null,"doi":null,"arxiv_id":"2404.13038","nct_id":null,"source_url":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2404.13038","archive_url":"https://space-kitty.com/papers/arxiv:2404.13038","updated":"2024-04-19","pmid":null,"pmcid":null,"openalex_id":null,"pdf_url":"https://arxiv.org/pdf/2404.13038","abstract":"Recent work on the limitations of using reinforcement learning from human feedback (RLHF) to incorporate human preferences into model behavior often raises social choice theory as a reference point. Social choice theory's analysis of settings such as voting mechanisms provides technical infrastructure that can inform how to aggregate human preferences amid disagreement. We analyze the problem settings of social choice and RLHF, identify key differences between them, and discuss how these differences may affect the RLHF interpretation of well-known technical results in social choice.","abstract_license":"CC0-1.0 (arXiv descriptive metadata)","license":null,"is_open_access":false,"retracted":false,"peer_reviewed":false,"categories":["cs.AI","cs.CY"],"details":null,"provenance":"arxiv","attribution":"Abstract: arXiv descriptive metadata (CC0). Thank you to arXiv for use of its open access interoperability. This service was not reviewed or approved by, nor does it necessarily express or reflect the policies or opinions of, arXiv.","topics":[],"cited_in_dossiers":[]}