{"id":"arxiv:2410.10336","kind":"preprint","title":"CoMAT: Chain of Mathematically Annotated Thought Improves Mathematical Reasoning","authors":["Joshua Ong Jun Leang","Aryo Pradipta Gema","Shay B. Cohen"],"author_count":3,"year":2024,"published":"2024-10-14","venue":"Proc. EMNLP 2025, pp. 20245-20274","cited_by":null,"doi":"10.18653/v1/2025.emnlp-main.1024","arxiv_id":"2410.10336","nct_id":null,"source_url":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2410.10336","archive_url":"https://space-kitty.com/papers/arxiv:2410.10336","updated":"2026-01-15","pmid":null,"pmcid":null,"openalex_id":null,"pdf_url":"https://arxiv.org/pdf/2410.10336","abstract":"Mathematical reasoning remains a significant challenge for large language models (LLMs), despite progress in prompting techniques such as Chain-of-Thought (CoT). We present **Chain of Mathematically Annotated Thought (CoMAT)**, which enhances reasoning through two stages: *Symbolic Conversion* (converting natural language queries into symbolic form) and *Reasoning Execution* (deriving answers from symbolic representations). CoMAT operates entirely with a single LLM and without external solvers. Across four LLMs, CoMAT outperforms traditional CoT on six out of seven benchmarks, achieving gains of 4.48% on MMLU-Redux (MATH) and 4.58% on GaoKao MCQ. In addition to improved performance, CoMAT ensures faithfulness and verifiability, offering a transparent reasoning process for complex mathematical tasks","abstract_license":"CC0-1.0 (arXiv descriptive metadata)","license":null,"is_open_access":false,"retracted":false,"peer_reviewed":false,"categories":["cs.AI","cs.CL","cs.LG","cs.SC"],"details":null,"provenance":"arxiv","attribution":"Abstract: arXiv descriptive metadata (CC0). Thank you to arXiv for use of its open access interoperability. This service was not reviewed or approved by, nor does it necessarily express or reflect the policies or opinions of, arXiv.","topics":[],"cited_in_dossiers":[]}