{"id":"arxiv:2410.17920","kind":"preprint","title":"Gaze-Assisted Medical Image Segmentation","authors":["Leila Khaertdinova","Ilya Pershin","Tatiana Shmykova","Bulat Ibragimov"],"author_count":4,"year":2024,"published":"2024-10-23","venue":null,"cited_by":null,"doi":null,"arxiv_id":"2410.17920","nct_id":null,"source_url":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2410.17920","archive_url":"https://space-kitty.com/papers/arxiv:2410.17920","updated":"2024-11-17","pmid":null,"pmcid":null,"openalex_id":null,"pdf_url":"https://arxiv.org/pdf/2410.17920","abstract":"The annotation of patient organs is a crucial part of various diagnostic and treatment procedures, such as radiotherapy planning. Manual annotation is extremely time-consuming, while its automation using modern image analysis techniques has not yet reached levels sufficient for clinical adoption. This paper investigates the idea of semi-supervised medical image segmentation using human gaze as interactive input for segmentation correction. In particular, we fine-tuned the Segment Anything Model in Medical Images (MedSAM), a public solution that uses various prompt types as additional input for semi-automated segmentation correction. We used human gaze data from reading abdominal images as a prompt for fine-tuning MedSAM. The model was validated on a public WORD database, which consists of 120 CT scans of 16 abdominal organs. The results of the gaze-assisted MedSAM were shown to be superior to the results of the state-of-the-art segmentation models. In particular, the average Dice coefficient for 16 abdominal organs was 85.8%, 86.7%, 81.7%, and 90.5% for nnUNetV2, ResUNet, original MedSAM, and our gaze-assisted MedSAM model, respectively.","abstract_license":"CC0-1.0 (arXiv descriptive metadata)","license":null,"is_open_access":false,"retracted":false,"peer_reviewed":false,"categories":["cs.CV"],"details":null,"provenance":"arxiv","attribution":"Abstract: arXiv descriptive metadata (CC0). Thank you to arXiv for use of its open access interoperability. This service was not reviewed or approved by, nor does it necessarily express or reflect the policies or opinions of, arXiv.","topics":[],"cited_in_dossiers":[]}