{"id":"arxiv:2411.14189","kind":"preprint","title":"Reevaluating $H_0$ Tension with Non-Planck CMB and DESI BAO Joint Analysis","authors":["Ye-Huang Pang","Xue Zhang","Qing-Guo Huang"],"author_count":3,"year":2024,"published":"2024-11-21","venue":null,"cited_by":null,"doi":null,"arxiv_id":"2411.14189","nct_id":null,"source_url":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2411.14189","archive_url":"https://space-kitty.com/papers/arxiv:2411.14189","updated":"2024-11-21","pmid":null,"pmcid":null,"openalex_id":null,"pdf_url":"https://arxiv.org/pdf/2411.14189","abstract":"$H_0$ tension in the spatially flat $Λ$CDM model is reevaluated by employing three sets of non-Planck CMB data, namely WMAP, WMAP+ACT, and WMAP+SPT, in conjunction with DESI BAO data and non-DESI BAO datasets including 6dFGS, SDSS DR7, and SDSS DR16. Our analysis yields $H_0 = 68.86\\pm 0.68~\\mathrm{km\\ s^{-1} Mpc^{-1}}$ with WMAP+DESI BAO, $H_0 = 68.72\\pm 0.51~\\mathrm{km\\ s^{-1} Mpc^{-1}}$ with WMAP+ACT+DESI BAO, and $H_0 = 68.62\\pm 0.52~\\mathrm{km\\ s^{-1} Mpc^{-1}}$ with WMAP+SPT+DESI BAO. The results of non-Planck CMB+DESI BAO exhibit a $3.4σ$, $3.7σ$, and $3.8σ$ tension with the SH0ES local measurement respectively which are around $1 σ$ lower in significance for the Hubble tension compared to Planck CMB+DESI BAO. Moreover, by combining DESI BAO data+non-Planck CMB measurements, we obtain a more stringent constraint on the Hubble constant compared to non-DESI BAO data+non-Planck CMB data, as well as reducing the significance of the Hubble tension.","abstract_license":"CC0-1.0 (arXiv descriptive metadata)","license":null,"is_open_access":false,"retracted":false,"peer_reviewed":false,"categories":["astro-ph.CO"],"details":null,"provenance":"arxiv","attribution":"Abstract: arXiv descriptive metadata (CC0). Thank you to arXiv for use of its open access interoperability. This service was not reviewed or approved by, nor does it necessarily express or reflect the policies or opinions of, arXiv.","topics":[],"cited_in_dossiers":[]}