{"id":"arxiv:2412.16234","kind":"preprint","title":"Is AI Robust Enough for Scientific Research?","authors":["Jun-Jie Zhang","Jiahao Song","Xiu-Cheng Wang","Fu-Peng Li","Zehan Liu","Jian-Nan Chen","Haoning Dang","Shiyao Wang","Yiyan Zhang","Jianhui Xu","Chunxiang Shi","Fei Wang","Long-Gang Pang","Nan Cheng","Weiwei Zhang","Duo Zhang","Deyu Meng"],"author_count":17,"year":2024,"published":"2024-12-19","venue":null,"cited_by":null,"doi":null,"arxiv_id":"2412.16234","nct_id":null,"source_url":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2412.16234","archive_url":"https://space-kitty.com/papers/arxiv:2412.16234","updated":"2024-12-19","pmid":null,"pmcid":null,"openalex_id":null,"pdf_url":"https://arxiv.org/pdf/2412.16234","abstract":"We uncover a phenomenon largely overlooked by the scientific community utilizing AI: neural networks exhibit high susceptibility to minute perturbations, resulting in significant deviations in their outputs. Through an analysis of five diverse application areas -- weather forecasting, chemical energy and force calculations, fluid dynamics, quantum chromodynamics, and wireless communication -- we demonstrate that this vulnerability is a broad and general characteristic of AI systems. This revelation exposes a hidden risk in relying on neural networks for essential scientific computations, calling further studies on their reliability and security.","abstract_license":"CC0-1.0 (arXiv descriptive metadata)","license":null,"is_open_access":false,"retracted":false,"peer_reviewed":false,"categories":["cs.LG","physics.comp-ph"],"details":null,"provenance":"arxiv","attribution":"Abstract: arXiv descriptive metadata (CC0). Thank you to arXiv for use of its open access interoperability. This service was not reviewed or approved by, nor does it necessarily express or reflect the policies or opinions of, arXiv.","topics":[],"cited_in_dossiers":[]}