{"id":"arxiv:2510.27044","kind":"preprint","title":"Limits of Generalization in RLVR: Two Case Studies in Mathematical Reasoning","authors":["Md Tanvirul Alam","Nidhi Rastogi"],"author_count":2,"year":2025,"published":"2025-10-30","venue":null,"cited_by":null,"doi":null,"arxiv_id":"2510.27044","nct_id":null,"source_url":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2510.27044","archive_url":"https://space-kitty.com/papers/arxiv:2510.27044","updated":"2025-11-30","pmid":null,"pmcid":null,"openalex_id":null,"pdf_url":"https://arxiv.org/pdf/2510.27044","abstract":"Mathematical reasoning is a central challenge for large language models (LLMs), requiring not only correct answers but also faithful reasoning processes. Reinforcement Learning with Verifiable Rewards (RLVR) has emerged as a promising approach for enhancing such capabilities; however, its ability to foster genuine reasoning remains unclear. We investigate RLVR on two combinatorial problems with fully verifiable solutions: \\emph{Activity Scheduling} and the \\emph{Longest Increasing Subsequence}, using carefully curated datasets with unique optima. Across multiple reward designs, we find that RLVR improves evaluation metrics but often by reinforcing superficial heuristics rather than acquiring new reasoning strategies. These findings highlight the limits of RLVR generalization, emphasizing the importance of benchmarks that disentangle genuine mathematical reasoning from shortcut exploitation and provide faithful measures of progress. Code available at https://github.com/xashru/rlvr-seq-generalization.","abstract_license":"CC0-1.0 (arXiv descriptive metadata)","license":null,"is_open_access":false,"retracted":false,"peer_reviewed":false,"categories":["cs.LG"],"details":null,"provenance":"arxiv","attribution":"Abstract: arXiv descriptive metadata (CC0). Thank you to arXiv for use of its open access interoperability. This service was not reviewed or approved by, nor does it necessarily express or reflect the policies or opinions of, arXiv.","topics":[],"cited_in_dossiers":[]}