{"id":"arxiv:2602.00610","kind":"preprint","title":"Practical Quantum Reservoir Computing in Rydberg Atom Arrays","authors":["Dong-Sheng Liu","Qing-Xuan Jie","Chang-Ling Zou","Xi-Feng Ren","Guang-Can Guo"],"author_count":5,"year":2026,"published":"2026-01-31","venue":null,"cited_by":null,"doi":"10.1103/pkhd-pl3w","arxiv_id":"2602.00610","nct_id":null,"source_url":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2602.00610","archive_url":"https://space-kitty.com/papers/arxiv:2602.00610","updated":"2026-01-31","pmid":null,"pmcid":null,"openalex_id":null,"pdf_url":"https://arxiv.org/pdf/2602.00610","abstract":"Quantum reservoir computing (QRC) is a promising quantum machine learning framework for near-term quantum platforms, yet the performance of different QRC architectures under realistic constraints remains largely unexplored. Here, we provide a comparative numerical study of single-step-QRC (SS-QRC) and multi-step-QRC (MS-QRC) architectures implemented on a Rydberg atom array. We demonstrate that while MS-QRC performance is highly sensitive to the underlying dynamical phase of matter and decoherence, SS-QRC exhibits greater robustness. Using the randomized measurement toolbox to mitigate measurement overhead, we reveal that sampling noise undermines the convergence property required for MS-QRC. This leads to a significant reduction in the information processing capacity (IPC) of MS-QRC, deteriorating its performance on nonlinear time-series benchmarks. In contrast, SS-QRC maintains high IPC and accuracy across both temporal and non-temporal tasks. Our results suggest SS-QRC as a preferred candidate for near-term practical applications due to its resilience to system configurations and statistical noise.","abstract_license":"CC0-1.0 (arXiv descriptive metadata)","license":null,"is_open_access":false,"retracted":false,"peer_reviewed":false,"categories":["quant-ph"],"details":null,"provenance":"arxiv","attribution":"Abstract: arXiv descriptive metadata (CC0). Thank you to arXiv for use of its open access interoperability. This service was not reviewed or approved by, nor does it necessarily express or reflect the policies or opinions of, arXiv.","topics":[],"cited_in_dossiers":[]}