{"id":"arxiv:2604.00443","kind":"preprint","title":"Polysemanticity or Polysemy? Lexical Identity Confounds Superposition Metrics","authors":["Iyad Ait Hou","Rebecca Hwa"],"author_count":2,"year":2026,"published":"2026-04-01","venue":null,"cited_by":null,"doi":null,"arxiv_id":"2604.00443","nct_id":null,"source_url":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2604.00443","archive_url":"https://space-kitty.com/papers/arxiv:2604.00443","updated":"2026-04-01","pmid":null,"pmcid":null,"openalex_id":null,"pdf_url":"https://arxiv.org/pdf/2604.00443","abstract":"If the same neuron activates for both \"lender\" and \"riverside,\" standard metrics attribute the overlap to superposition--the neuron must be compressing two unrelated concepts. This work explores how much of the overlap is due a lexical confound: neurons fire for a shared word form (such as \"bank\") rather than for two compressed concepts. A 2x2 factorial decomposition reveals that the lexical-only condition (same word, different meaning) consistently exceeds the semantic-only condition (different word, same meaning) across models spanning 110M-70B parameters. The confound carries into sparse autoencoders (18-36% of features blend senses), sits in <=1% of activation dimensions, and hurts downstream tasks: filtering it out improves word sense disambiguation and makes knowledge edits more selective (p = 0.002).","abstract_license":"CC0-1.0 (arXiv descriptive metadata)","license":null,"is_open_access":false,"retracted":false,"peer_reviewed":false,"categories":["cs.CL","cs.AI"],"details":null,"provenance":"arxiv","attribution":"Abstract: arXiv descriptive metadata (CC0). Thank you to arXiv for use of its open access interoperability. This service was not reviewed or approved by, nor does it necessarily express or reflect the policies or opinions of, arXiv.","topics":[],"cited_in_dossiers":[]}