{"id":"arxiv:2608.20652","kind":"preprint","title":"Zero-dimensional multi-physics-constrained parameter design and optimization for advanced quasi-isodynamic stellarators","authors":["Ziyuan Sun","Zixuan Guo","Xianglin Hao","Longjun Qin","Qian Liu","Xiang Teng"],"author_count":6,"year":2026,"published":"2026-08-21","venue":null,"cited_by":0,"doi":null,"arxiv_id":"2608.20652","nct_id":null,"source_url":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.20652","archive_url":"https://space-kitty.com/papers/arxiv:2608.20652","updated":"2026-08-21","pmid":null,"pmcid":null,"openalex_id":"W7204142214","pdf_url":"https://arxiv.org/pdf/2608.20652","abstract":"A zero-dimensional (0D) multi-physics-constrained framework for parameter design and optimization of Stable Quasi-Isodynamic Designs (SQuIDs) is presented. Single- and multi-objective optimizations for three staged devices are carried out using an in-house stellarator 0D systems code: YF-1 for discharge demonstration, YF-2 for scientific break even, and YF-3 for a commercial demonstration plant. Pareto searches map the main design trade-offs across the three generations. The equal weight optima for YF-2 and YF-3 both lie in the electron-root favorable regime of the adopted root proxy: YF-2 recovers $Q_{phys} \\sim 1$, while YF-3 reaches an ignited point at reactor scale. Future work will couple engineering feasibility and economic assessment modules for integrated plant evaluation.","abstract_license":"CC0-1.0 (arXiv descriptive metadata)","license":null,"is_open_access":false,"retracted":false,"peer_reviewed":false,"categories":["physics.plasm-ph"],"details":null,"provenance":"arxiv","attribution":"Abstract: arXiv descriptive metadata (CC0). Thank you to arXiv for use of its open access interoperability. This service was not reviewed or approved by, nor does it necessarily express or reflect the policies or opinions of, arXiv.","topics":[{"slug":"inertial-fusion","name":"Inertial Confinement Fusion","domain_slug":"energy"}],"cited_in_dossiers":[]}