{"id":"arxiv:2609.07512","kind":"preprint","title":"Statistical versus machine learning-based spatial interpolation of post-processed ensemble weather forecasts","authors":["Mária Lakatos"],"author_count":1,"year":2026,"published":"2026-09-07","venue":null,"cited_by":null,"doi":null,"arxiv_id":"2609.07512","nct_id":null,"source_url":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.07512","archive_url":"https://space-kitty.com/papers/arxiv:2609.07512","updated":"2026-09-07","pmid":null,"pmcid":null,"openalex_id":null,"pdf_url":"https://arxiv.org/pdf/2609.07512","abstract":"Statistical post-processing improves ensemble weather forecasts, but generating calibrated predictions at locations without observations remains challenging. This study compares statistical and machine-learning-based methods for post-processing ECMWF 2-m temperature and 10-m wind speed forecasts at observed and unobserved stations in Germany. We consider EMOS-based approaches, distributional regression networks, Transformers, and graph neural networks under both limited and extended predictor settings. For temperature, we also investigate linear forecast combinations and propose an altitude-aware linear pool (ALP). The results show that post-processing improves upon the raw ensemble in most settings, but no single method performs best across all variables, station groups, and evaluation metrics. The proposed ALP provides a small but significant improvement over the standard linear pool at unobserved locations.","abstract_license":"CC0-1.0 (arXiv descriptive metadata)","license":null,"is_open_access":false,"retracted":false,"peer_reviewed":false,"categories":["cs.LG","stat.AP","stat.ML"],"details":null,"provenance":"arxiv","attribution":"Abstract: arXiv descriptive metadata (CC0). Thank you to arXiv for use of its open access interoperability. This service was not reviewed or approved by, nor does it necessarily express or reflect the policies or opinions of, arXiv.","topics":[],"cited_in_dossiers":[]}