{"id":"arxiv:2609.24203","kind":"preprint","title":"Sound-Horizon-Independent Test of Cosmic Distance Duality Relation Using Artificial Neural Networks and Gaussian Processes","authors":["Bo-Hao Jiang","Guo-Jian Wang","Tao Yang"],"author_count":3,"year":2026,"published":"2026-09-21","venue":null,"cited_by":null,"doi":null,"arxiv_id":"2609.24203","nct_id":null,"source_url":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.24203","archive_url":"https://space-kitty.com/papers/arxiv:2609.24203","updated":"2026-09-21","pmid":null,"pmcid":null,"openalex_id":null,"pdf_url":"https://arxiv.org/pdf/2609.24203","abstract":"The cosmic distance duality relation (CDDR), $D_L(z)(1+z)^{-2}/D_A(z) \\equiv 1$, is a fundamental relation in modern cosmology linking luminosity distance $D_L$ and angular diameter distance $D_A$. We define $η(z) \\equiv D_L(z)(1+z)^{-2}/D_A(z)$ and reconstruct the relevant quantities over $0 < z < 2.5$ using two independent non-parametric methods: Gaussian processes (GP) and artificial neural networks (ANN). Specifically, we reconstruct $D_L$ from three different Type Ia supernovae (SNe$~$Ia) compilations (PantheonPlus, Union3, and DES-Dovekie), the baryon acoustic oscillation distance ratio $D_M/D_H$ from SDSS and DESI, and the Hubble function $H(z)$ from cosmic chronometer (CC) data. Our CDDR test is independent of both the cosmological model and the sound horizon $r_d$ calibration, as $D_M/D_H$ naturally eliminates $r_d$. We render our GP reconstructions insensitive to mean-function and kernel choices via full Bayesian marginalization over hyperparameters, with ANN as a cross-check$-$revealing the impact of data sparsity on the latter. Our results show no significant deviation from the CDDR exceeding $2σ$, and for the CC+BAO+DES-Dovekie combination it remains within $1σ$ over most of the redshift range. With $r_d$ eliminated, varying the only remaining external parameter $M_B$ systematically shifts $η(z)$ through the $M_B$-$H_0$ degeneracy, indicating that the observed $η\\neq1$ signal is closely tied to $H_0$ tension among datasets and is likely driven by $M_B$ systematics rather than a true CDDR violation. Future high-quality CC, BAO, and SNe$~$Ia data$-$with either improved $M_B$ calibration or $M_B$-free distance measurements$-$will be essential for extending this calibration-free approach.","abstract_license":"CC0-1.0 (arXiv descriptive metadata)","license":null,"is_open_access":false,"retracted":false,"peer_reviewed":false,"categories":["astro-ph.CO","astro-ph.IM"],"details":null,"provenance":"arxiv","attribution":"Abstract: arXiv descriptive metadata (CC0). Thank you to arXiv for use of its open access interoperability. This service was not reviewed or approved by, nor does it necessarily express or reflect the policies or opinions of, arXiv.","topics":[],"cited_in_dossiers":[]}