{"id":"arxiv:2610.06432","kind":"preprint","title":"Valid Stopping in Adaptive Generator-Verifier Loops","authors":["Mahmoud Hegazy","Michael I. Jordan","Aymeric Dieuleveut"],"author_count":3,"year":2026,"published":"2026-10-05","venue":null,"cited_by":0,"doi":null,"arxiv_id":"2610.06432","nct_id":null,"source_url":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.06432","archive_url":"https://space-kitty.com/papers/arxiv:2610.06432","updated":"2026-10-05","pmid":null,"pmcid":null,"openalex_id":"W7220715562","pdf_url":"https://arxiv.org/pdf/2610.06432","abstract":"Numerous agentic workflows are based on a generator-verifier loop: a generator proposes candidates, a cheap verifier scores them, and the workflow terminates when a proposal is verified as good enough. The verifier typically proxies a more costly ground-truth oracle, and as the generator searches adaptively against it, false acceptances may accumulate. Proposals can pass the proxy but fail under the costlier ground-truth check. We study when to stop these loops while controlling the false discovery rate of the accepted proposals. Our construction introduces tools of independent interest in distribution-free statistical testing and conformal risk control, including analysis of $e$-values constructed through index betting and a novel conformal risk control procedure for non-monotone losses. We validate the approach in synthetic settings and on a protein-design benchmark.","abstract_license":"CC0-1.0 (arXiv descriptive metadata)","license":null,"is_open_access":false,"retracted":false,"peer_reviewed":false,"categories":["stat.ML","cs.AI","cs.LG","stat.ME"],"details":null,"provenance":"arxiv","attribution":"Abstract: arXiv descriptive metadata (CC0). Thank you to arXiv for use of its open access interoperability. This service was not reviewed or approved by, nor does it necessarily express or reflect the policies or opinions of, arXiv.","topics":[{"slug":"protein-design","name":"AI Protein Design & Structure Prediction","domain_slug":"biotech"}],"cited_in_dossiers":[]}