{"id":"arxiv:2610.12192","kind":"preprint","title":"Topological inequalities for conic-line arrangements with some prescribed singularities","authors":["Marco Golla","Piotr Pokora"],"author_count":2,"year":2026,"published":"2026-10-08","venue":null,"cited_by":null,"doi":null,"arxiv_id":"2610.12192","nct_id":null,"source_url":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.12192","archive_url":"https://space-kitty.com/papers/arxiv:2610.12192","updated":"2026-10-08","pmid":null,"pmcid":null,"openalex_id":null,"pdf_url":"https://arxiv.org/pdf/2610.12192","abstract":"We study arrangements of conics and lines in the complex projective plane from the viewpoint of 4-manifolds. We introduce combinatorial conic-line arrangements, the conic-line counterpart of rank-3 matroids, together with their topological and smooth realisations, and we ask which restrictions on a complex arrangement survive when its components are replaced by locally-flat spheres in the same homology classes with the same local singularity models. For an ADE combinatorial conic-line arrangement of even total degree admitting a topological realisation we prove a Hirzebruch-type inequality; the proof uses only branched covers and the local topology of rational double points. In the complex-algebraic category we show that equality holds exactly when the arrangement is a maximising curve, hence free with prescribed exponents. We then introduce divisible and odd combinatorial conic-line arrangements and obtain inequalities and congruences for the multiplicity sequence of their resolutions, via cyclic branched covers, the G-signature theorem, spin structures, and Furuta's 10/8-theorem.","abstract_license":"CC0-1.0 (arXiv descriptive metadata)","license":null,"is_open_access":false,"retracted":false,"peer_reviewed":false,"categories":["math.GT","math.AG","math.CO"],"details":null,"provenance":"arxiv","attribution":"Abstract: arXiv descriptive metadata (CC0). Thank you to arXiv for use of its open access interoperability. This service was not reviewed or approved by, nor does it necessarily express or reflect the policies or opinions of, arXiv.","topics":[],"cited_in_dossiers":[]}