{"id":"arxiv:2610.12429","kind":"preprint","title":"Listening to the Horizon: Probing Near-Horizon Reflectivity with GW250114","authors":["R. Prasad","Subhodeep Sarkar","Sudipta Sarkar"],"author_count":3,"year":2026,"published":"2026-10-08","venue":null,"cited_by":null,"doi":null,"arxiv_id":"2610.12429","nct_id":null,"source_url":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.12429","archive_url":"https://space-kitty.com/papers/arxiv:2610.12429","updated":"2026-10-08","pmid":null,"pmcid":null,"openalex_id":null,"pdf_url":"https://arxiv.org/pdf/2610.12429","abstract":"Testing the horizon properties of astrophysical black holes is a central goal of gravitational-wave astronomy. The recently identified Direct Wave (DW), a prompt non-quasinormal component of GW250114, provides a new probe of near-horizon physics. While it remains unclear whether the DW itself carries horizon information, we show that it enables a novel null test of horizon reflectivity. If the remnant is an exotic compact object (ECO) with a partially reflecting surface, inward plunge radiation is reflected and leaks back through the gravitational potential barrier, producing a delayed DW echo whose amplitude is set by the surface reflectivity ($|\\mathcal{R}_s|$). We construct the corresponding echo template, normalized by the observed DW, and search for it in quasinormal-mode-filtered data. We find no evidence for an echo ($\\ln\\mathcal{B}=-2.9$) and obtain the 90\\% credible bound $|\\mathcal{R}_s|<0.06$, corresponding to a reflected energy fraction below $0.4\\%$, for surfaces from $0.1\\, M_f$ to a Planck length from the would-be horizon. Our method thus turns the prompt ringdown signal into a direct test of horizon reflectivity.","abstract_license":"CC0-1.0 (arXiv descriptive metadata)","license":null,"is_open_access":false,"retracted":false,"peer_reviewed":false,"categories":["gr-qc","astro-ph.HE"],"details":null,"provenance":"arxiv","attribution":"Abstract: arXiv descriptive metadata (CC0). Thank you to arXiv for use of its open access interoperability. This service was not reviewed or approved by, nor does it necessarily express or reflect the policies or opinions of, arXiv.","topics":[],"cited_in_dossiers":[]}