{"id":"arxiv:2610.16635","kind":"preprint","title":"ACED: Reference-Anchored Aggregation of Natural-Language and Executable Evidence for Mathematical Reasoning","authors":["Yiyi Lu","Jiaxiang Geng","Bing Luo"],"author_count":3,"year":2026,"published":"2026-10-12","venue":null,"cited_by":null,"doi":null,"arxiv_id":"2610.16635","nct_id":null,"source_url":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.16635","archive_url":"https://space-kitty.com/papers/arxiv:2610.16635","updated":"2026-10-12","pmid":null,"pmcid":null,"openalex_id":null,"pdf_url":"https://arxiv.org/pdf/2610.16635","abstract":"Natural-language self-consistency and executable programs provide complementary test-time evidence for mathematical reasoning, yet either channel may support the same semantic error. Thus we propose ACED, a reference-anchored framework that treats the self-consistency answer as the default and executable outputs as supporting evidence rather than interchangeable votes. ACED converts source-specific answer counts into smoothed supports, combines them through a weighted logarithmic pool, and overrides the reference only when a calibrated relative-evidence margin is exceeded. The same rule supports both candidate selection and admission of executable-only answers. Across five math word-problem benchmarks, ACED matches or outperforms the corresponding baselines. On GSM8K, ACED-CANDIDATE recovers 89.7% of the attainable candidate-set gain with only three damaging overrides, while ACED-ALL reaches 86.9% accuracy versus 82.6% for direct Program-of-Thought aggregation. These results show that preserving evidence provenance enables more reliable integration of natural-language and executable reasoning.","abstract_license":"CC0-1.0 (arXiv descriptive metadata)","license":null,"is_open_access":false,"retracted":false,"peer_reviewed":false,"categories":["cs.LG"],"details":null,"provenance":"arxiv","attribution":"Abstract: arXiv descriptive metadata (CC0). Thank you to arXiv for use of its open access interoperability. This service was not reviewed or approved by, nor does it necessarily express or reflect the policies or opinions of, arXiv.","topics":[],"cited_in_dossiers":[]}