{"id":"arxiv:2610.17013","kind":"preprint","title":"Indirect Dark Matter Detection in the Multi-Messenger Era: Experiments, Systematics, Anomalies, and Prospects for Discovery","authors":["Muad Ghaith","Khaled Obaideen"],"author_count":2,"year":2026,"published":"2026-10-12","venue":null,"cited_by":null,"doi":null,"arxiv_id":"2610.17013","nct_id":null,"source_url":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.17013","archive_url":"https://space-kitty.com/papers/arxiv:2610.17013","updated":"2026-10-12","pmid":null,"pmcid":null,"openalex_id":null,"pdf_url":"https://arxiv.org/pdf/2610.17013","abstract":"Indirect searches for dark matter (DM) span gamma rays, charged cosmic rays, neutrinos, X-rays, radio emission, the cosmic microwave background (CMB), and the 21~cm signal, but reported constraints and anomalies vary in evidential strength. This critical review synthesizes peer-reviewed literature from January 2000 through October 2026 using a structured search strategy. We assess observations through a framework linking particle interactions and halo source terms to propagation or cosmological energy deposition, instrumental response, background modeling, and statistical inference. Fermi-LAT observations of dwarf spheroidal galaxies provide robust GeV-scale benchmarks for DM annihilation, whereas Galactic-center searches offer higher expected signals but depend more on foregrounds and halo profiles. Charged-cosmic-ray measurements are precise but limited by propagation and source uncertainties, while neutrino searches offer complementary sensitivity through solar capture, directional and flavor information, and high-mass annihilation or decay. Several widely discussed signals, including the 3.5~keV line, 511~keV emission, the Galactic-center GeV excess, charged-particle features, cluster radio excesses, and candidate gamma-ray lines remain inconclusive because of limited independent confirmation, uncertain target scaling, spectral degeneracies, or background-modeling limitations. Cosmological observations provide complementary constraints from CMB energy-injection limits and 21~cm measurements of the intergalactic medium. Artificial intelligence increasingly supports reconstruction and inference but requires rigorous calibration and domain-shift validation. The strongest case for DM discovery would require statistically consistent evidence across independent targets, instruments, or messengers, under common particle-physics parameters, and with well-characterized uncertainties.","abstract_license":"CC0-1.0 (arXiv descriptive metadata)","license":null,"is_open_access":false,"retracted":false,"peer_reviewed":false,"categories":["astro-ph.HE","astro-ph.CO","astro-ph.GA","hep-ph"],"details":null,"provenance":"arxiv","attribution":"Abstract: arXiv descriptive metadata (CC0). Thank you to arXiv for use of its open access interoperability. This service was not reviewed or approved by, nor does it necessarily express or reflect the policies or opinions of, arXiv.","topics":[],"cited_in_dossiers":[]}