{"id":"arxiv:2610.27111","kind":"article","title":"Energy Consumption of Post-Quantum Cryptography on Constrained and General-Purpose Architectures","authors":["Olivier Gillot","William J. Buchanan","Madjid G. Tehrani"],"author_count":3,"year":2026,"published":"2026-10-19","venue":"Gillot, O., Buchanan, W. J., & Tehrani, M. G. (2026). Energy Consumption of Post-Quantum Cryptography on Constrained and General-Purpose Architectures. Cryptography, 10(4), 55","cited_by":1,"doi":"10.3390/cryptography10040055","arxiv_id":"2610.27111","nct_id":null,"source_url":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.27111","archive_url":"https://space-kitty.com/papers/arxiv:2610.27111","updated":"2026-10-25","pmid":null,"pmcid":null,"openalex_id":"W7172346943","pdf_url":"https://arxiv.org/pdf/2610.27111","abstract":"With Q-day approaching, the transition to post-quantum cryptography (PQC) has begun, with governments across the US, UK and EU mandating migration to quantum-resistant standards. This paper benchmarks the three NIST-standardised PQC algorithms - FIPS 203 (ML-KEM), FIPS 204 (ML-DSA) and FIPS 205 (SLH-DSA) - across key generation, signing and verification operations, measuring both computational performance and energy consumption on a range of constrained IoT-class devices, from the 32-bit Raspberry Pi 1 and Zero to the 64-bit Raspberry Pi 4, as well as commodity laptop hardware. Using the FNIRSI FNB58 USB power meter and OpenSSL~3.5, results show that ML-KEM and ML-DSA achieve energy and speed efficiency comparable to classical elliptic-curve cryptography across all tested architectures. However, SLH-DSA signing is inadvisable on constrained hardware: energy costs for SLH-DSA signing on 32-bit devices were up to 243\\% higher than on equivalent 64-bit hardware, making it impractical for resource-limited IoT deployments. These findings have direct implications for IoT security practitioners planning PQC migration.","abstract_license":"CC0-1.0 (arXiv descriptive metadata)","license":null,"is_open_access":false,"retracted":false,"peer_reviewed":null,"categories":["cs.CR"],"details":null,"provenance":"arxiv","attribution":"Abstract: arXiv descriptive metadata (CC0). Thank you to arXiv for use of its open access interoperability. This service was not reviewed or approved by, nor does it necessarily express or reflect the policies or opinions of, arXiv.","topics":[{"slug":"quantum-communication-crypto","name":"Quantum Networks & Post-Quantum Cryptography","domain_slug":"quantum-computing"}],"cited_in_dossiers":[]}