{"id":"arxiv:2610.31948","kind":"preprint","title":"Sharp Bounds on the Winner's Bias under Independent and Nonnegatively Correlated Noise","authors":["Ivan Viakhirev","Kirill Borodin","Grach Mkrtchian"],"author_count":3,"year":2026,"published":"2026-10-22","venue":null,"cited_by":0,"doi":null,"arxiv_id":"2610.31948","nct_id":null,"source_url":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.31948","archive_url":"https://space-kitty.com/papers/arxiv:2610.31948","updated":"2026-10-22","pmid":null,"pmcid":null,"openalex_id":"W7223691069","pdf_url":"https://arxiv.org/pdf/2610.31948","abstract":"Reporting the best of $M$ noisy, unbiased scores overstates the winner's value by up to $c\\sqrt{V}$, where $V$ is the total noise variance and the sharp constant $c$ depends on how the noise is dependent. It was known only at the two extremes, arbitrary dependence ($\\sqrt{(M-1)/M}$) and i.i.d. noise. We determine it for two classes in between: for independent, not identically distributed noise it is $\\sqrt{(M-1)/(2M)}$, and for pairwise nonnegatively correlated noise it is $(M-1)/M$; for uncorrelated noise this answers the maximum version of an open question about the expected range. Explicit finite constructions attain both. As a corollary, the bias of the cross-validation estimator is bounded sharply within each class. All theorems are formally verified in Lean 4. Across 448 language-model and classifier selection pipelines, designs with per-candidate items realize a median 0.75 of the independent-class ceiling. At a fixed item budget, scoring all candidates on shared items is markedly less optimistic than giving each candidate its own items.","abstract_license":"CC0-1.0 (arXiv descriptive metadata)","license":null,"is_open_access":false,"retracted":false,"peer_reviewed":false,"categories":["cs.LG","math.ST"],"details":null,"provenance":"arxiv","attribution":"Abstract: arXiv descriptive metadata (CC0). Thank you to arXiv for use of its open access interoperability. This service was not reviewed or approved by, nor does it necessarily express or reflect the policies or opinions of, arXiv.","topics":[{"slug":"ai-mathematics","name":"AI for Mathematics & Formal Proof","domain_slug":"math-cs"}],"cited_in_dossiers":[]}