{"id":"arxiv:2610.38103","kind":"preprint","title":"The Prestige: Benchmarking Cognitive Visual Reasoning using Magic Tricks","authors":["Shuo Wen","Beixi Du","Edwin Meriaux","Junming Shi","Chloe Si","David Meger","Doina Precup","Gregory Dudek"],"author_count":8,"year":2026,"published":"2026-10-28","venue":null,"cited_by":null,"doi":null,"arxiv_id":"2610.38103","nct_id":null,"source_url":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.38103","archive_url":"https://space-kitty.com/papers/arxiv:2610.38103","updated":"2026-10-28","pmid":null,"pmcid":null,"openalex_id":null,"pdf_url":"https://arxiv.org/pdf/2610.38103","abstract":"We introduce The Prestige, a video understanding benchmark that probes cognitive visual reasoning through professional magic performances, where deliberate misdirection challenges models to track events and explain unexpected outcomes. The benchmark comprises open-ended questions ranging from temporal and causal understanding to robustness against adversarial questions. Evaluation of leading open-source and proprietary VLMs reveals a substantial gap between even the strongest model and human performance. We also find systematic discrepancies between human and automated grading and identify recurring model failure modes. Ablations further show that models can select correct multiple-choice answers even when they fail to generate correct explanations independently, motivating further investigations into question formats. Together, these findings highlight limitations in both VLM reasoning and its evaluation, underscoring the need for more reliable video understanding models and more rigorous benchmarks.","abstract_license":"CC0-1.0 (arXiv descriptive metadata)","license":null,"is_open_access":true,"retracted":false,"peer_reviewed":false,"categories":["cs.CV","cs.AI"],"details":null,"provenance":"arxiv","attribution":"Abstract: arXiv descriptive metadata (CC0). Thank you to arXiv for use of its open access interoperability. This service was not reviewed or approved by, nor does it necessarily express or reflect the policies or opinions of, arXiv.","topics":[{"slug":"interpretability","name":"Mechanistic Interpretability","domain_slug":"ai"}],"cited_in_dossiers":[]}