{"id":"arxiv:2610.39602","kind":"preprint","title":"Evaluating Cultural Knowledge Editing in Vision-Language Models","authors":["Malvina Nikandrou","Georgios Pantazopoulos","Ioannis Konstas","Alessandro Suglia"],"author_count":4,"year":2026,"published":"2026-10-29","venue":null,"cited_by":null,"doi":null,"arxiv_id":"2610.39602","nct_id":null,"source_url":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.39602","archive_url":"https://space-kitty.com/papers/arxiv:2610.39602","updated":"2026-10-29","pmid":null,"pmcid":null,"openalex_id":null,"pdf_url":"https://arxiv.org/pdf/2610.39602","abstract":"Current Vision-Language Models (VLMs) frequently fail to recognize culture-specific concepts, especially from underrepresented regions. Effectively injecting this long-tail knowledge into existing models remains a challenge. In this work, we investigate knowledge editing as a targeted alternative by introducing CulturalBind, a benchmark comprising 3.2K images of 1K concepts from 6 domains, designed to evaluate culture-aware cross-modal knowledge as well as concept-level knowledge editing in VLMs. Pre-edit evaluation reveals that textual and visual knowledge is decoupled: models often demonstrate text-based knowledge of cultural concepts but fail to identify them from images. We then evaluate editing methods in single and sequential scenarios. Although current methods successfully correct individual visual recognition errors, they exhibit low cross-modal portability, failing to integrate edits into the model's broader parametric knowledge. Furthermore, performance degrades rapidly under sequential editing, highlighting the need for comprehensive adaptation approaches that better consolidate multimodal knowledge over time.","abstract_license":"CC0-1.0 (arXiv descriptive metadata)","license":null,"is_open_access":false,"retracted":false,"peer_reviewed":false,"categories":["cs.CV","cs.CL"],"details":null,"provenance":"arxiv","attribution":"Abstract: arXiv descriptive metadata (CC0). Thank you to arXiv for use of its open access interoperability. This service was not reviewed or approved by, nor does it necessarily express or reflect the policies or opinions of, arXiv.","topics":[],"cited_in_dossiers":[]}