# Bell's inequality: Physics meets Probability

Preprint · Andrei Khrennikov

- Archive id: arxiv:0709.3909
- Published: 2007-09-25
- Venue: Information Science 179, N. 5, 492-504 (2009)
- arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/0709.3909
- Citations: 32
- Source URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/0709.3909
- PDF: https://arxiv.org/pdf/0709.3909
- Provenance: arxiv

## Abstract

We remind the viewpoint that violation of Bell's inequality might be interpreted not only as an evidence of the alternative -- either nonlocality or \`\`death of reality'' (under the assumption the quantum mechanics is incomplete). Violation of Bell's type inequalities is a well known sufficient condition of incompatibility of random variables -- impossibility to realize them on a single probability space. Thus, in fact, we should take into account an additional interpretation of violation of Bell's inequality -- a few pairs of random variables (two dimensional vector variables) involved in the EPR-Bohm experiment are incompatible. They could not be realized on a single Kolmogorov probability space. Thus one can choose between: a) completeness of quantum mechanics; b) nonlocality; c) \`\` death of reality''; d) non-Kolmogorovness. In any event, violation of Bell's inequality has a variety of possible interpretations. Hence, it could not be used to derive the unique conclusion on the relation between quantum and classical models.

_Abstract reproduced under CC0-1.0 (arXiv descriptive metadata)._

Topics: [Quantum Foundations](https://space-kitty.com/topics/quantum-foundations)

---
Space Kitty Archive · https://space-kitty.com · API: https://space-kitty.com/api/v1 · MCP: https://space-kitty.com/mcp · Premium: $0.20/request via x402 (Base Sepolia (testnet)). Metadata: arXiv (CC0), OpenAlex (CC0), Europe PMC (CC BY/CC0 works), ClinicalTrials.gov.