# Protein structure prediction guided by cross-linking restraints - A systematic evaluation of the impact of the cross-linking spacer length

Article · Tommy Hofmann, Axel W. Fischer, Jens Meiler, Stefan Kalkhof

- Archive id: arxiv:1506.00136
- Published: 2015-05-30
- Venue: Methods
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymeth.2015.05.014
- arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/1506.00136
- Citations: 51
- Source URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/1506.00136
- PDF: https://arxiv.org/pdf/1506.00136
- Provenance: arxiv

## Abstract

Recent development of high-resolution mass spectrometry (MS) instruments enables chemical cross-linking (XL) to become a high-throughput method for obtaining structural information about proteins. Restraints derived from XL-MS experiments have been used successfully for structure refinement and protein-protein docking. However, one formidable question is under which circumstances XL-MS data might be sufficient to determine a protein's tertiary structure de novo? Answering this question will not only include understanding the impact of XL-MS data on sampling and scoring within a de novo protein structure prediction algorithm, it must also determine an optimal cross-linker type and length for protein structure determination. While a longer cross-linker will yield more restraints, the value of each restraint for protein structure prediction decreases as the restraint is consistent with a larger conformational space. In this study, the number of cross-links and their discriminative power was systematically analyzed in silico on a set of 2,055 non-redundant protein folds considering Lys-Lys, Lys-Asp, Lys-Glu, Cys-Cys, and Arg-Arg reactive cross-linkers between 1 Å and 60 Å. Depending on the protein size a heuristic was developed that determines the optimal cross-linker length. Next, simulated restraints of variable length were used to de novo predict the tertiary structure of fifteen proteins using the BCL::Fold algorithm. The results demonstrate that a distinct cross-linker length exists for which information content for de novo protein structure prediction is maximized. The sampling accuracy improves on average by 1.0 Å and up to 2.2 Å in the most prominent example. XL-MS restraints enable consistently an improved selection of native-like models with an average enrichment of 2.1.

_Abstract reproduced under CC0-1.0 (arXiv descriptive metadata)._

Topics: [AI Protein Design & Structure Prediction](https://space-kitty.com/topics/protein-design)

---
Space Kitty Archive · https://space-kitty.com · API: https://space-kitty.com/api/v1 · MCP: https://space-kitty.com/mcp · Premium: $0.20/request via x402 (Base Sepolia (testnet)). Metadata: arXiv (CC0), OpenAlex (CC0), Europe PMC (CC BY/CC0 works), ClinicalTrials.gov.