# Why Black Hole Information Loss is Paradoxical

Preprint · David Wallace

- Archive id: arxiv:1710.03783
- Published: 2017-10-10
- Venue: PhilSci-Archive (University of Pittsburgh)
- arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/1710.03783
- Citations: 10
- Source URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/1710.03783
- PDF: https://arxiv.org/pdf/1710.03783
- Provenance: arxiv

## Abstract

I distinguish between two versions of the black hole information-loss paradox. The first arises from apparent failure of unitarity on the spacetime of a completely evaporating black hole, which appears to be non-globally-hyperbolic; this is the most commonly discussed version of the paradox in the foundational and semipopular literature, and the case for calling it \`paradoxical' is less than compelling. But the second arises from a clash between a fully-statistical-mechanical interpretation of black hole evaporation and the quantum-field-theoretic description used in derivations of the Hawking effect. This version of the paradox arises long before a black hole completely evaporates, seems to be the version that has played a central role in quantum gravity, and is genuinely paradoxical. After explicating the paradox, I discuss the implications of more recent work on AdS/CFT duality and on the \`Firewall paradox', and conclude that the paradox is if anything now sharper. The article is written at a (relatively) introductory level and does not assume advanced knowledge of quantum gravity.

_Abstract reproduced under CC0-1.0 (arXiv descriptive metadata)._

Topics: [Quantum Gravity & Holography](https://space-kitty.com/topics/quantum-gravity-holography)

---
Space Kitty Archive · https://space-kitty.com · API: https://space-kitty.com/api/v1 · MCP: https://space-kitty.com/mcp · Premium: $0.20/request via x402 (Base Sepolia (testnet)). Metadata: arXiv (CC0), OpenAlex (CC0), Europe PMC (CC BY/CC0 works), ClinicalTrials.gov.