# Caveats in Generating Medical Imaging Labels from Radiology Reports

Preprint · Tobi Olatunji, Li Yao, Ben Covington, Alexander Rhodes, Anthony Upton

- Archive id: arxiv:1905.02283
- Published: 2019-05-06
- arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/1905.02283
- Citations: 9
- Source URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/1905.02283
- PDF: https://arxiv.org/pdf/1905.02283
- Provenance: arxiv

## Abstract

Acquiring high-quality annotations in medical imaging is usually a costly process. Automatic label extraction with natural language processing (NLP) has emerged as a promising workaround to bypass the need of expert annotation. Despite the convenience, the limitation of such an approximation has not been carefully examined and is not well understood. With a challenging set of 1,000 chest X-ray studies and their corresponding radiology reports, we show that there exists a surprisingly large discrepancy between what radiologists visually perceive and what they clinically report. Furthermore, with inherently flawed report as ground truth, the state-of-the-art medical NLP fails to produce high-fidelity labels.

_Abstract reproduced under CC0-1.0 (arXiv descriptive metadata)._

Topics: [AI in Clinical Medicine](https://space-kitty.com/topics/ai-medicine)

---
Space Kitty Archive · https://space-kitty.com · API: https://space-kitty.com/api/v1 · MCP: https://space-kitty.com/mcp · Premium: $0.20/request via x402 (Base Sepolia (testnet)). Metadata: arXiv (CC0), OpenAlex (CC0), Europe PMC (CC BY/CC0 works), ClinicalTrials.gov.