# Magic State Distillation: Not as Costly as You Think

Preprint · Daniel Litinski

- Archive id: arxiv:1905.06903
- Published: 2019-05-16
- Venue: Quantum 3, 205 (2019)
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.22331/q-2019-12-02-205
- arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/1905.06903
- Source URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/1905.06903
- PDF: https://arxiv.org/pdf/1905.06903
- Provenance: arxiv

## Abstract

Despite significant overhead reductions since its first proposal, magic state distillation is often considered to be a very costly procedure that dominates the resource cost of fault-tolerant quantum computers. The goal of this work is to demonstrate that this is not true. By writing distillation circuits in a form that separates qubits that are capable of error detection from those that are not, most logical qubits used for distillation can be encoded at a very low code distance. This significantly reduces the space-time cost of distillation, as well as the number of qubits. In extreme cases, it can cost less to distill a magic state than to perform a logical Clifford gate on full-distance logical qubits.

_Abstract reproduced under CC0-1.0 (arXiv descriptive metadata)._

Topics: [Quantum Error Correction & Fault Tolerance](https://space-kitty.com/topics/quantum-error-correction)

Cited in dossiers:
- [Quantum Error Correction & Fault Tolerance: State of the Field (October 2026)](https://space-kitty.com/dossiers/quantum-error-correction)

---
Space Kitty Archive · https://space-kitty.com · API: https://space-kitty.com/api/v1 · MCP: https://space-kitty.com/mcp · Premium: $0.20/request via x402 (Base Sepolia (testnet)). Metadata: arXiv (CC0), OpenAlex (CC0), Europe PMC (CC BY/CC0 works), ClinicalTrials.gov.