# On the meaning of "quantum supremacy" experiments

Preprint · Robert Alicki

- Archive id: arxiv:2001.00791
- Published: 2020-01-03
- arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2001.00791
- Citations: 2
- Source URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2001.00791
- PDF: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2001.00791
- Provenance: arxiv

## Abstract

The recently reported experimental results claiming "quantum supremacy" achieved by Google quantum device are critically discussed. The Google team constructed a quantum chaotic system based on Josephson junction technology which cannot be reliably simulated by the present day supercomputers. However, the similar "supremacy" can be realized for properly designed micro-mechanical devices, like periodically forced Duffing oscillator, using the available technology of quartz clocks. It is also reminded that classical and quantum chaotic systems behave in a similar way. Therefore, in this case, one should speak rather about the "analog supremacy" than "quantum supremacy" what means that even now mechanical analog computers can outperform supercomputers when the computational task can be reduced to sampling of ergodic measures generated by chaotic systems.

_Abstract reproduced under CC0-1.0 (arXiv descriptive metadata)._

Topics: [Quantum Algorithms & Quantum Advantage](https://space-kitty.com/topics/quantum-algorithms-advantage)

---
Space Kitty Archive · https://space-kitty.com · API: https://space-kitty.com/api/v1 · MCP: https://space-kitty.com/mcp · Premium: $0.20/request via x402 (Base Sepolia (testnet)). Metadata: arXiv (CC0), OpenAlex (CC0), Europe PMC (CC BY/CC0 works), ClinicalTrials.gov.