# Measurements of the first-flux-penetration field in surface-treated and coated Nb: Distinguishing between surface pinning and an interface energy barrier

Preprint · Md Asaduzzaman, Ryan M. L. McFadden, Edward Thoeng, Robert E. Laxdal, Tobias Junginger

- Archive id: arxiv:2402.15500
- Published: 2024-02-23
- Venue: Supercond. Sci. Technol. 37, 085006 (2024)
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6668/ad54f3
- arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2402.15500
- Source URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2402.15500
- PDF: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2402.15500
- Provenance: arxiv

## Abstract

We report measurements of the first-flux-penetration field in surface-treated and coated Nb samples using muon spin rotation ($μ$SR). Using thin Ag foils as energy moderators for the implanted muon spin-probes, we "profile" the vortex penetration field $μ\_{0} H\_{\\mathrm{vp}}$ at sub-surface depths on the order of $\\sim 10$ $\\mathrmμ$m to $\\sim 100$ $\\mathrmμ$m. In a coated sample \[Nb$\_3$Sn(2 $\\mathrmμ$m)/Nb\], we find that $μ\_{0} H\_{\\mathrm{vp}}$ is depth-independent with a value of 234.5(35) mT, consistent with Nb's metastable superheating field and suggestive of surface energy barrier for flux penetration. Conversely, in a surface-treated sample \[Nb baked in vacuum at 120 $^{\\circ}$C for 48 h\], vortex penetration onsets close to pure Nb's lower critical field $μ\_{0}H\_\\mathrm{c1} \\approx 170$ mT, but increases with increasing implantation depth, consistent with flux-pinning localized at the surface. The implication of these results for technical applications of superconducting Nb, such as superconducting radio frequency (SRF) cavities, is discussed.

_Abstract reproduced under CC0-1.0 (arXiv descriptive metadata)._

---
Space Kitty Archive · https://space-kitty.com · API: https://space-kitty.com/api/v1 · MCP: https://space-kitty.com/mcp · Premium: $0.20/request via x402 (Base Sepolia (testnet)). Metadata: arXiv (CC0), OpenAlex (CC0), Europe PMC (CC BY/CC0 works), ClinicalTrials.gov.