# Chinchilla Scaling: A replication attempt

Preprint · Tamay Besiroglu, Ege Erdil, Matthew Barnett, Josh You

- Archive id: arxiv:2404.10102
- Published: 2024-04-15
- arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2404.10102
- Source URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2404.10102
- PDF: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2404.10102
- Provenance: arxiv

## Abstract

Hoffmann et al. (2022) propose three methods for estimating a compute-optimal scaling law. We attempt to replicate their third estimation procedure, which involves fitting a parametric loss function to a reconstruction of data from their plots. We find that the reported estimates are inconsistent with their first two estimation methods, fail at fitting the extracted data, and report implausibly narrow confidence intervals--intervals this narrow would require over 600,000 experiments, while they likely only ran fewer than 500. In contrast, our rederivation of the scaling law using the third approach yields results that are compatible with the findings from the first two estimation procedures described by Hoffmann et al.

_Abstract reproduced under CC0-1.0 (arXiv descriptive metadata)._

Topics: [LLM Architectures & Pretraining](https://space-kitty.com/topics/llm-architectures)

Cited in dossiers:
- [LLM Architectures & Pretraining: State of the Field (October 2026)](https://space-kitty.com/dossiers/llm-architectures)

---
Space Kitty Archive · https://space-kitty.com · API: https://space-kitty.com/api/v1 · MCP: https://space-kitty.com/mcp · Premium: $0.20/request via x402 (Base Sepolia (testnet)). Metadata: arXiv (CC0), OpenAlex (CC0), Europe PMC (CC BY/CC0 works), ClinicalTrials.gov.