# X-Ray View of Little Red Dots: Do They Host Supermassive Black Holes?

Article · Tonima Tasnim Ananna, Ákos Bogdán, Orsolya E. Kovács, Priyamvada Natarajan, Ryan C. Hickox

- Archive id: arxiv:2404.19010
- Published: 2024-07-01
- Venue: The Astrophysical Journal Letters
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.3847/2041-8213/ad5669
- arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2404.19010
- Citations: 138
- Source URL: https://doi.org/10.3847/2041-8213/ad5669
- PDF: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2404.19010
- Provenance: openalex+arxiv

## Abstract

The discovery of Little Red Dots (LRDs) -- a population of compact, high-redshift, dust-reddened galaxies -- is one of the most surprising results from JWST. However, the nature of LRDs is still debated: does the near-infrared emission originate from accreting supermassive black holes (SMBHs), or intense star formation? In this work, we utilize ultra-deep Chandra observations and study LRDs residing behind the lensing galaxy cluster, Abell~2744. We probe the X-ray emission from individual galaxies but find that they remain undetected and provide SMBH mass upper limits of $\\lesssim(1.5-16)\\times10^{6}~\\rm{M\_{\\odot}}$ assuming Eddington limited accretion. To increase the signal-to-noise ratios, we conduct a stacking analysis of the full sample with a total lensed exposure time of $\\approx87$~Ms. We also bin the galaxies based on their stellar mass, lensing magnification, and detected broad-line H$α$ emission. For the LRDs exhibiting broad-line H$α$ emission, there is a hint of a stacked signal ($\\sim2.6σ$), corresponding to a SMBH mass of $\\sim3.2\\times10^{6}~\\rm{M\_{\\odot}}$. Assuming unobscured, Eddington-limited accretion, this BH mass is at least 1.5 orders of magnitude lower than that inferred from virial mass estimates using JWST spectra. Given galaxy-dominated stellar mass estimates, our results imply that LRDs do not host over-massive SMBHs and/or accrete at a few percent of their Eddington limit. However, alternative stellar mass estimates may still support that LRDs host over-massive BHs. The significant discrepancy between the JWST and Chandra data hints that the scaling relations used to infer the SMBH mass from the H$α$ line and virial relations may not be applicable for high-redshift LRDs.

_Abstract reproduced under CC0-1.0 (arXiv descriptive metadata)._

Topics: [JWST & the Early Universe](https://space-kitty.com/topics/early-universe-jwst)

---
Space Kitty Archive · https://space-kitty.com · API: https://space-kitty.com/api/v1 · MCP: https://space-kitty.com/mcp · Premium: $0.20/request via x402 (Base Sepolia (testnet)). Metadata: arXiv (CC0), OpenAlex (CC0), Europe PMC (CC BY/CC0 works), ClinicalTrials.gov.