# Using non-DESI data to confirm and strengthen the DESI 2024 spatially-flat $w_0w_a$CDM cosmological parameterization result

Preprint · Chan-Gyung Park, Javier de Cruz Perez, Bharat Ratra

- Archive id: arxiv:2405.00502
- Published: 2024-05-01
- Venue: Phys. Rev. D 110, 123533 (2024)
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevd.110.123533
- arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2405.00502
- Source URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2405.00502
- PDF: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2405.00502
- Provenance: arxiv

## Abstract

We use a combination of Planck cosmic microwave background (CMB) anisotropy data and non-CMB data that include Pantheon+ type Ia supernovae (SNIa), Hubble parameter \[$H(z)$\], growth factor ($fσ\_8$) measurements, and a collection of baryon acoustic oscillation (BAO) data, but not recent DESI 2024 BAO measurements, to confirm the DESI 2024 (DESI+CMB+PantheonPlus) data compilation support for dynamical dark energy with an evolving equation of state parameter $w(z) = w\_0 + w\_a z/(1+z)$. From our joint compilation of CMB and non-CMB data, in a spatially-flat cosmological model, we obtain $w\_0 = -0.850 \\pm 0.059$ and $w\_a = -0.59^{+0.26}\_{-0.22}$ and find that this dynamical dark energy is favored over a cosmological constant by $\\sim 2σ$. Our data constraints on the flat $w\_0w\_a$CDM parameterization are slightly more restrictive than the DESI 2024 constraints, with the DESI 2024 and our values of $w\_0$ and $w\_a$ differing by $-0.27σ$ and $0.44σ$, respectively. Our data compilation slightly more strongly favors the flat $w\_0w\_a$CDM model over the flat $Λ$CDM model than does the DESI 2024 data compilation. We note that our CMB and non-CMB data $w\_0w\_a$CDM parameterization cosmological constraints are discrepant at 2.7$σ$, a little larger than the 1.9$σ$ discrepancy between DESI DR1 BAO and CMB data flat $Λ$CDM model cosmological constraints. We also show that if we remove the Pantheon+ SNIa contribution from the non-CMB data, for the $w\_0w\_a$CDM parameterization we still find tension between P18 and non-CMB data (2.5$σ$) and P18+lensing and non-CMB data (2.4$σ$). Even after the exclusion of Pantheon+ SNIa data the $Λ$CDM model is still disfavoured at $\\sim 2σ$ c.l.

_Abstract reproduced under CC0-1.0 (arXiv descriptive metadata)._

---
Space Kitty Archive · https://space-kitty.com · API: https://space-kitty.com/api/v1 · MCP: https://space-kitty.com/mcp · Premium: $0.20/request via x402 (Base Sepolia (testnet)). Metadata: arXiv (CC0), OpenAlex (CC0), Europe PMC (CC BY/CC0 works), ClinicalTrials.gov.