# CoMAT: Chain of Mathematically Annotated Thought Improves Mathematical Reasoning

Preprint · Joshua Ong Jun Leang, Aryo Pradipta Gema, Shay B. Cohen

- Archive id: arxiv:2410.10336
- Published: 2024-10-14
- Venue: Proc. EMNLP 2025, pp. 20245-20274
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/2025.emnlp-main.1024
- arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2410.10336
- Source URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2410.10336
- PDF: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2410.10336
- Provenance: arxiv

## Abstract

Mathematical reasoning remains a significant challenge for large language models (LLMs), despite progress in prompting techniques such as Chain-of-Thought (CoT). We present \*\*Chain of Mathematically Annotated Thought (CoMAT)\*\*, which enhances reasoning through two stages: \*Symbolic Conversion\* (converting natural language queries into symbolic form) and \*Reasoning Execution\* (deriving answers from symbolic representations). CoMAT operates entirely with a single LLM and without external solvers. Across four LLMs, CoMAT outperforms traditional CoT on six out of seven benchmarks, achieving gains of 4.48% on MMLU-Redux (MATH) and 4.58% on GaoKao MCQ. In addition to improved performance, CoMAT ensures faithfulness and verifiability, offering a transparent reasoning process for complex mathematical tasks

_Abstract reproduced under CC0-1.0 (arXiv descriptive metadata)._

---
Space Kitty Archive · https://space-kitty.com · API: https://space-kitty.com/api/v1 · MCP: https://space-kitty.com/mcp · Premium: $0.20/request via x402 (Base Sepolia (testnet)). Metadata: arXiv (CC0), OpenAlex (CC0), Europe PMC (CC BY/CC0 works), ClinicalTrials.gov.
