# Proteins with alternative folds reveal blind spots in AlphaFold-based protein structure prediction

Preprint · Devlina Chakravarty, Myeongsang Lee, Lauren L. Porter

- Archive id: arxiv:2410.14898
- Published: 2024-10-18
- arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2410.14898
- Citations: 2
- Source URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2410.14898
- PDF: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2410.14898
- Provenance: arxiv

## Abstract

In recent years, advances in artificial intelligence (AI) have transformed structural biology, particularly protein structure prediction. Though AI-based methods, such as AlphaFold (AF), often predict single conformations of proteins with high accuracy and confidence, predictions of alternative folds are often inaccurate, low-confidence, or simply not predicted at all. Here, we review three blind spots that alternative conformations reveal about AF-based protein structure prediction. First, proteins that assume conformations distinct from their training-set homologs can be mispredicted. Second, AF overrelies on its training set to predict alternative conformations. Third, degeneracies in pairwise representations can lead to high-confidence predictions inconsistent with experiment. These weaknesses suggest approaches to predict alternative folds more reliably.

_Abstract reproduced under CC0-1.0 (arXiv descriptive metadata)._

Topics: [AI Protein Design & Structure Prediction](https://space-kitty.com/topics/protein-design)

---
Space Kitty Archive · https://space-kitty.com · API: https://space-kitty.com/api/v1 · MCP: https://space-kitty.com/mcp · Premium: $0.20/request via x402 (Base Sepolia (testnet)). Metadata: arXiv (CC0), OpenAlex (CC0), Europe PMC (CC BY/CC0 works), ClinicalTrials.gov.
