# Magnetized ICF implosions: Non-axial magnetic field topologies

Article · C. A. Walsh, D. J. Strozzi, A. Povilus, S. T. O'Neill, L. Leal, B. Pollock, H. Sio, B. Z. Djordjevic, J. P. Chittenden, J. D. Moody

- Archive id: arxiv:2411.10538
- Published: 2024-11-15
- Venue: Nuclear Fusion
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/1741-4326/adb7f0
- arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2411.10538
- Citations: 4
- Source URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2411.10538
- PDF: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2411.10538
- Provenance: arxiv

## Abstract

This paper explores 4 different magnetic field topologies for application to spherical inertial confinement fusion implosions: axial, mirror, cusp and closed field lines. A mirror field is found to enhance the impact of magnetization over an axial field; this is because the mirror field more closely follows the hot-spot surface. A cusp field, while simple to generate, is not found to have any benefits over the tried-and-tested axial field. Closed field lines are found to be of the greatest benefit to hot-spot performance, with the simulated design undergoing a 2x increase in ion temperature before alpha-heating is considered. The plasma properties of the simulation with closed field lines are radically different from the unmagnetized counterpart, with electron temperatures in excess of 100 keV, suggesting that a fundamental redesign of the capsule implosion is possible if this method is pursued.

_Abstract reproduced under CC0-1.0 (arXiv descriptive metadata)._

Topics: [Inertial Confinement Fusion](https://space-kitty.com/topics/inertial-fusion)

---
Space Kitty Archive · https://space-kitty.com · API: https://space-kitty.com/api/v1 · MCP: https://space-kitty.com/mcp · Premium: $0.20/request via x402 (Base Sepolia (testnet)). Metadata: arXiv (CC0), OpenAlex (CC0), Europe PMC (CC BY/CC0 works), ClinicalTrials.gov.