# Reevaluating $H_0$ Tension with Non-Planck CMB and DESI BAO Joint Analysis

Preprint · Ye-Huang Pang, Xue Zhang, Qing-Guo Huang

- Archive id: arxiv:2411.14189
- Published: 2024-11-21
- arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2411.14189
- Source URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2411.14189
- PDF: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2411.14189
- Provenance: arxiv

## Abstract

$H\_0$ tension in the spatially flat $Λ$CDM model is reevaluated by employing three sets of non-Planck CMB data, namely WMAP, WMAP+ACT, and WMAP+SPT, in conjunction with DESI BAO data and non-DESI BAO datasets including 6dFGS, SDSS DR7, and SDSS DR16. Our analysis yields $H\_0 = 68.86\\pm 0.68~\\mathrm{km\\ s^{-1} Mpc^{-1}}$ with WMAP+DESI BAO, $H\_0 = 68.72\\pm 0.51~\\mathrm{km\\ s^{-1} Mpc^{-1}}$ with WMAP+ACT+DESI BAO, and $H\_0 = 68.62\\pm 0.52~\\mathrm{km\\ s^{-1} Mpc^{-1}}$ with WMAP+SPT+DESI BAO. The results of non-Planck CMB+DESI BAO exhibit a $3.4σ$, $3.7σ$, and $3.8σ$ tension with the SH0ES local measurement respectively which are around $1 σ$ lower in significance for the Hubble tension compared to Planck CMB+DESI BAO. Moreover, by combining DESI BAO data+non-Planck CMB measurements, we obtain a more stringent constraint on the Hubble constant compared to non-DESI BAO data+non-Planck CMB data, as well as reducing the significance of the Hubble tension.

_Abstract reproduced under CC0-1.0 (arXiv descriptive metadata)._

---
Space Kitty Archive · https://space-kitty.com · API: https://space-kitty.com/api/v1 · MCP: https://space-kitty.com/mcp · Premium: $0.20/request via x402 (Base Sepolia (testnet)). Metadata: arXiv (CC0), OpenAlex (CC0), Europe PMC (CC BY/CC0 works), ClinicalTrials.gov.