# Is AI Robust Enough for Scientific Research?

Preprint · Jun-Jie Zhang, Jiahao Song, Xiu-Cheng Wang, Fu-Peng Li, Zehan Liu, Jian-Nan Chen, Haoning Dang, Shiyao Wang, Yiyan Zhang, Jianhui Xu, Chunxiang Shi, Fei Wang, Long-Gang Pang, Nan Cheng, Weiwei Zhang, Duo Zhang, Deyu Meng

- Archive id: arxiv:2412.16234
- Published: 2024-12-19
- arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2412.16234
- Source URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2412.16234
- PDF: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2412.16234
- Provenance: arxiv

## Abstract

We uncover a phenomenon largely overlooked by the scientific community utilizing AI: neural networks exhibit high susceptibility to minute perturbations, resulting in significant deviations in their outputs. Through an analysis of five diverse application areas -- weather forecasting, chemical energy and force calculations, fluid dynamics, quantum chromodynamics, and wireless communication -- we demonstrate that this vulnerability is a broad and general characteristic of AI systems. This revelation exposes a hidden risk in relying on neural networks for essential scientific computations, calling further studies on their reliability and security.

_Abstract reproduced under CC0-1.0 (arXiv descriptive metadata)._

---
Space Kitty Archive · https://space-kitty.com · API: https://space-kitty.com/api/v1 · MCP: https://space-kitty.com/mcp · Premium: $0.20/request via x402 (Base Sepolia (testnet)). Metadata: arXiv (CC0), OpenAlex (CC0), Europe PMC (CC BY/CC0 works), ClinicalTrials.gov.