# Causally Grounded Mechanistic Interpretability for LLMs with Faithful Natural-Language Explanations

Preprint · Ajay Pravin Mahale

- Archive id: arxiv:2603.09988
- Published: 2026-02-13
- arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.09988
- Citations: 0
- Source URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.09988
- PDF: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2603.09988
- Provenance: arxiv

## Abstract

Mechanistic interpretability identifies internal circuits responsible for model behaviors, yet translating these findings into human-understandable explanations remains an open problem. We present a pipeline that bridges circuit-level analysis and natural language explanations by (i) identifying causally important attention heads via activation patching, (ii) generating explanations using both template-based and LLM-based methods, and (iii) evaluating faithfulness using ERASER-style metrics adapted for circuit-level attribution. We evaluate on the Indirect Object Identification (IOI) task in GPT-2 Small (124M parameters), identifying six attention heads accounting for 61.4% of the logit difference. Our circuit-based explanations achieve 100% sufficiency but only 22% comprehensiveness, revealing distributed backup mechanisms. LLM-generated explanations outperform template baselines by 64% on quality metrics. We find no correlation (r = 0.009) between model confidence and explanation faithfulness, and identify three failure categories explaining when explanations diverge from mechanisms.

_Abstract reproduced under CC0-1.0 (arXiv descriptive metadata)._

Topics: [Mechanistic Interpretability](https://space-kitty.com/topics/interpretability)

---
Space Kitty Archive · https://space-kitty.com · API: https://space-kitty.com/api/v1 · MCP: https://space-kitty.com/mcp · Premium: $0.20/request via x402 (Base Sepolia (testnet)). Metadata: arXiv (CC0), OpenAlex (CC0), Europe PMC (CC BY/CC0 works), ClinicalTrials.gov.