# Evaluating Human-AI Safety: A Framework for Measuring Harmful Capability Uplift

Preprint · Michelle Vaccaro, Jaeyoon Song, Abdullah Almaatouq, Michiel A. Bakker

- Archive id: arxiv:2603.26676
- Published: 2026-03-06
- arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.26676
- Citations: 0
- Source URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.26676
- PDF: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2603.26676
- Provenance: arxiv

## Abstract

Current frontier AI safety evaluations emphasize static benchmarks, third-party annotations, and red-teaming. In this position paper, we argue that AI safety research should focus on human-centered evaluations that measure harmful capability uplift: the marginal increase in a user's ability to cause harm with a frontier model beyond what conventional tools already enable. We frame harmful capability uplift as a core AI safety metric, ground it in prior social science research, and provide concrete methodological guidance for systematic measurement. We conclude with actionable steps for developers, researchers, funders, and regulators to make harmful capability uplift evaluation a standard practice.

_Abstract reproduced under CC0-1.0 (arXiv descriptive metadata)._

Topics: [AI Alignment & Safety](https://space-kitty.com/topics/alignment-safety)

---
Space Kitty Archive · https://space-kitty.com · API: https://space-kitty.com/api/v1 · MCP: https://space-kitty.com/mcp · Premium: $0.20/request via x402 (Base Sepolia (testnet)). Metadata: arXiv (CC0), OpenAlex (CC0), Europe PMC (CC BY/CC0 works), ClinicalTrials.gov.