# What Attention Recalls and Recurrence Controls in Hybrid Language Models

Preprint · Kirill Afendulev, Alexey Dontsov, Elena Tutubalina, Anton Korznikov

- Archive id: arxiv:2609.04434
- Published: 2026-09-03
- arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.04434
- Source URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.04434
- PDF: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2609.04434
- Provenance: arxiv

## Abstract

Hybrid language models combine attention with a fixed-size recurrent state, but the role of each channel remains unclear. We introduce two cache-level interventions. Split-prefill keeps only the KV cache or only the recurrent state from a prefilled context, then generates an answer. State-swap pairs the KV cache from one context with the recurrent state from another in a single forward pass. On Qwen3.5 and Falcon-H1, the two channels split sharply by function. Exact retrieval survives only through attention (64-98% of full accuracy) and collapses to zero through recurrence. Output language and persona reverse the pattern: both survive recurrence (70-80% and 3-5x) while KV-only drops to ~1% language accuracy. State-swap confirms this causally: the answer takes its value from the KV side and its language from the recurrent side. Recurrent-only generation also accepts words that were never in the context but share meaning or parts with seen items. Attention provides a lookup over what was said; the recurrent state shapes how the model says it next.

_Abstract reproduced under CC0-1.0 (arXiv descriptive metadata)._

Topics: [LLM Architectures & Pretraining](https://space-kitty.com/topics/llm-architectures)

Cited in dossiers:
- [LLM Architectures & Pretraining: State of the Field (October 2026)](https://space-kitty.com/dossiers/llm-architectures)

---
Space Kitty Archive · https://space-kitty.com · API: https://space-kitty.com/api/v1 · MCP: https://space-kitty.com/mcp · Premium: $0.20/request via x402 (Base Sepolia (testnet)). Metadata: arXiv (CC0), OpenAlex (CC0), Europe PMC (CC BY/CC0 works), ClinicalTrials.gov.