# Maximum-Likelihood Amplitude Estimation for Quantum Monte Carlo Integration on Trapped-Ion Hardware: Convergence, Noise-Floor Saturation, Depth-Dependent Bias

Preprint · Aditi Lal, Alex Khan, Rut Lineswala, Abhishek Chopra

- Archive id: arxiv:2609.25992
- Published: 2026-09-22
- arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.25992
- Source URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.25992
- PDF: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2609.25992
- Provenance: arxiv

## Abstract

Quantum Amplitude Estimation promises to accelerate Monte Carlo integration by replacing the classical $\\varepsilon \\propto N^{-1/2}$ sampling law with the Heisenberg-limited $\\varepsilon \\propto N^{-1}$ scaling, but whether any part of that advantage survives on present-day hardware is an empirical question. We report a systematic experimental benchmark of a Maximum-Likelihood Amplitude Estimation QMC pipeline on IonQ trapped-ion processors, comprising 60 hardware trials on IonQ Forte-1 across five settings(5 & 9 qubits, 100-200 shots per depth, linear & exponential amplification schedules, ~113 device-hours), together with 100 trials on IonQ Aria-1 & Forte-1 noise models at 5, 9 & 19 qubits. The pipeline combines controlled-$R\_y$ rotational state preparation, Grover-based amplitude amplification and maximum-likelihood inference and is benchmarked against $b\_{\\max}^{-1}\\!\\int\_0^{b\_{\\max}}\\!\\sin^2\\!x\\,\\mathrm{d}x$ with $b\_{\\max}=π/5$ ,given results emerge. First, the noiseless limit it attains $\\varepsilon \\propto N^{-0.88}$, close to the Heisenberg-scaling reference, reducing the error 54-74x over a 133x increase in oracle calls. Second, scaling does not survive on hardware. Every noisy backend saturates at an error floor of (2-5)x 10^{-2}, with fitted exponents of 0.04-0.15 on Forte-1 linear schedules and $α\\le\\!0$ on the vendor noise models: beyond the optimal shallow depth, however, deeper amplification provides no sustained accuracy gain and instead returns to the noise floor. Forte-1 hardware also outperformed IonQ's own Aria-1 noise model at every depth $m \\ge 2$, indicating that vendor noise models are bad predictors of MLAE accuracy. The practical implication for UQ is that on current devices the useful operating point is a shallow, schedule-tuned amplification depth chosen so that the deepest circuit lands near p~1/2 not the deepest schedule the coherence budget allows.

_Abstract reproduced under CC0-1.0 (arXiv descriptive metadata)._

---
Space Kitty Archive · https://space-kitty.com · API: https://space-kitty.com/api/v1 · MCP: https://space-kitty.com/mcp · Premium: $0.20/request via x402 (Base Sepolia (testnet)). Metadata: arXiv (CC0), OpenAlex (CC0), Europe PMC (CC BY/CC0 works), ClinicalTrials.gov.