# Sensitivity of calibration-free DESI DR2 BAO--supernova constraints to a distance-duality tilt

Preprint · Mikel Artola, Stéphane Fay, Leandros Perivolaropoulos

- Archive id: arxiv:2610.16496
- Published: 2026-10-12
- arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.16496
- Source URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.16496
- PDF: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2610.16496
- Provenance: arxiv

## Abstract

Recent measurements from DESI baryon acoustic oscillations (BAO) have reported a moderate preference for dynamical dark energy, challenging the $Λ$CDM paradigm. Nonetheless, such a trend could reflect a tension between the shape and the offset of the Hubble diagrams predicted by current BAO and Type Ia supernovae (SN) data, which may underpin a possible breakdown of the cosmic distance duality relation linking luminosity distances $D\_{\\rm L}$ and angular-diameter distances $D\_{\\rm A}$. We explore this possibility by parametrizing deviations from this relation as $η(z)\\equiv D\_{\\rm L}/\[{(1+z)}^2D\_{\\rm A}\]=α{(1+z)}^\\varepsilon$, and investigate how the preference for a Chevallier-Polarski-Linder (CPL) dynamical dark energy is modified once $\\varepsilon\\neq0$ is allowed. Using DESI DR2 and uncalibrated SN data (Pantheon$+$, DES-Dovekie, Union3, and Union3.1), we find that allowing $\\varepsilon$ to vary freely in both $Λ$CDM and CPL reduces the CPL preference with respect to $Λ$CDM by a larger amount than the addition of spatial curvature $Ω\_k$; only Union3.1 exhibits comparable reductions. We also find that the preference reduction is robust to alternative $η(z)$ parametrizations, and that the $η(z)$ constraints remain stable under the removal of BAO tracers or low-redshift cutoffs for Pantheon$+$, whereas the DES-Dovekie preference largely disappears once $z\<0.1$ SN are removed. In a separate calibrated analysis, illustrative Planck sound-horizon and SH0ES absolute-magnitude priors give $α\\simeq0.942\\pm0.014$, quantifying the normalization mismatch under those assumptions. We also discuss photon-loss and varying-$G$ interpretations: ordinary positive opacity cannot explain the negative central tilts $\\varepsilon$ found for a $Λ$CDM background, while local gravity tests strongly constrain the illustrative unscreened varying-$G$ scenario.

_Abstract reproduced under CC0-1.0 (arXiv descriptive metadata)._

---
Space Kitty Archive · https://space-kitty.com · API: https://space-kitty.com/api/v1 · MCP: https://space-kitty.com/mcp · Premium: $0.20/request via x402 (Base Sepolia (testnet)). Metadata: arXiv (CC0), OpenAlex (CC0), Europe PMC (CC BY/CC0 works), ClinicalTrials.gov.