# Grid or Nodes? Probing Object Memory in World Models Under Partial Observability

Preprint · Justin McMillen, Yasin Yilmaz

- Archive id: arxiv:2610.18637
- Published: 2026-10-13
- arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.18637
- Citations: 0
- Source URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.18637
- PDF: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2610.18637
- Provenance: arxiv

## Abstract

A robot's world model must remember objects that leave the camera's view. FloWM, a learned world model, keeps them in a spatial grid of features that it moves with five built-in velocities. A node memory instead keeps each object's position and velocity as numbers. We compare them in FloWM's own block world, with an oracle-fed Kalman tracker as the node memory. How the grid is read changes its score: a single-cell probe finds 66% of out-of-view blocks, while FloWM's own probe 89%. FloWM also scores 8 points higher in view although no frame is shown, which we attribute to its write-back of its own predictions. Out of view, the tracker reaches FloWM's range in 14KB against 5.6MB, with no probe. On diagonal motion, outside its five velocities, FloWM finds 11% of blocks even after fine-tuning, while the unchanged tracker keeps 93%. Faster blocks defeat both until one more allowed speed takes the tracker to 94%, where FloWM's built-in shifts would need 25 copies of its grid. A learned node memory must still replace the oracles and handle velocity under noise, long gaps, and the bounce.

_Abstract reproduced under CC0-1.0 (arXiv descriptive metadata)._

Topics: [Single-Cell & Spatial Omics](https://space-kitty.com/topics/single-cell-spatial)

---
Space Kitty Archive · https://space-kitty.com · API: https://space-kitty.com/api/v1 · MCP: https://space-kitty.com/mcp · Premium: $0.20/request via x402 (Base Sepolia (testnet)). Metadata: arXiv (CC0), OpenAlex (CC0), Europe PMC (CC BY/CC0 works), ClinicalTrials.gov.