# Forecasting Associations, Not Interventions: A Preregistered Causal Audit of Covariate-Aware Time Series Foundation Models

Preprint · Zong-Han Bai

- Archive id: arxiv:2610.31869
- Published: 2026-10-22
- arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.31869
- Source URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.31869
- PDF: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2610.31869
- Provenance: arxiv

## Abstract

Covariate-aware time series foundation models (TSFMs) accept a future path for a control variable and return a forecast, inviting what-if queries. The query is interventional; the models are trained on observational data. We determine whether their answers are the conditional slope $\\partial E\[Y\|X\]$ or the interventional effect $\\partial E\[Y\|do(X)\]$, at three levels. Theory: a Bayes-optimal observational predictor answers interventional queries associationally unless the adjustment set is available and used; for in-context least squares we derive the resulting confounding gap -- a model's effect estimate under an observational minus under a randomized context -- in closed form, a parameter-free reference line. Behaviour: on a preregistered grid with exact counterfactual ground truth, Chronos-2, TiRex-2, TabPFN-TS and TimesFM-2.5 all track this line ($R^2$ 0.90-1.00) and respond more confounded than regression itself (slopes 1.3-1.8), on linear and nonlinear structural models. Pairs of models with identical observational laws prove this is not an identifiability limit: when the effect is identifiable, least squares recovers 100% of the true effect difference, Chronos-2 75%, TiRex-2 34%. Representation: linear probes decode the data-generating regime (94-96%) and the true effect ($R^2$ 0.7-0.9) from embeddings that the forecasts ignore. On two physical systems with randomized actuators, pretrained models under-respond by 2-5x and ignore in-window confounding. Minutes of interventional post-training on 3,000 synthetic series cut the gap by up to 83% and transfer outside the training prior. Its forecasting cost is a replay-distribution effect: replaying the model's own pretraining prior cuts it from +47% to +10% MASE, and with low-rank adaptation yields a recipe meeting the preregistered criterion over three seeds (52-61% gap reduction at +1-3% cost) while improving the DoTime benchmark.

_Abstract reproduced under CC0-1.0 (arXiv descriptive metadata)._

---
Space Kitty Archive · https://space-kitty.com · API: https://space-kitty.com/api/v1 · MCP: https://space-kitty.com/mcp · Premium: $0.20/request via x402 (Base Sepolia (testnet)). Metadata: arXiv (CC0), OpenAlex (CC0), Europe PMC (CC BY/CC0 works), ClinicalTrials.gov.