# Sustainability of TSFM Deployment and Pretraining: From Carbon Footprint Analysis to Mitigation via Pruning

Preprint · Cécile Luc, Nathanaël Lemonnier, Ievgen Redko

- Archive id: arxiv:2610.32859
- Published: 2026-10-23
- arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.32859
- Source URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.32859
- PDF: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2610.32859
- Provenance: arxiv

## Abstract

Time Series Foundation Models (TSFMs) offer strong zero-shot forecasting capabilities, but their high pretraining cost raises a practical sustainability question: does this upfront investment pay off over a full deployment lifecycle, compared to supervised standalone models that must be periodically retrained? We model the cumulative carbon cost of different approaches across a realistic industrial scenario: Chronos-2 amortizes its pretraining cost within months for large or frequently queried deployments, but a classical model remains cheaper indefinitely for small or rarely queried ones. For cases where reducing the TSFM's own cost matters, we show that removing a single encoder block (7.9% of parameters) via a gradient-free pruning criterion yields a consistent 6 to 9% reduction in FLOPs, CO2 emissions, and latency, at essentially no cost to zero-shot forecasting performance across a 25-task benchmark.

_Abstract reproduced under CC0-1.0 (arXiv descriptive metadata)._

---
Space Kitty Archive · https://space-kitty.com · API: https://space-kitty.com/api/v1 · MCP: https://space-kitty.com/mcp · Premium: $0.20/request via x402 (Base Sepolia (testnet)). Metadata: arXiv (CC0), OpenAlex (CC0), Europe PMC (CC BY/CC0 works), ClinicalTrials.gov.